I agree with this and almost made a very similar comment, but decided talking about it would piss people off, which I didn’t feel like doing.
aaaand there’s the meta-contrarian motivated credulity about things that really, really should have triggered more skepticism.
Overall estimating a 65% chance the webpage is basically correct in terms of the substance of the claims
It’s not.
This is of course what you would have to say either way, no?
I agree with this and almost made a very similar comment, but decided talking about it would piss people off, which I didn’t feel like doing.
aaaand there’s the meta-contrarian motivated credulity about things that really, really should have triggered more skepticism.
It’s not.
This is of course what you would have to say either way, no?