aaaand there’s the meta-contrarian motivated credulity about things that really, really should have triggered more skepticism.
Overall estimating a 65% chance the webpage is basically correct in terms of the substance of the claims
It’s not.
This is of course what you would have to say either way, no?
aaaand there’s the meta-contrarian motivated credulity about things that really, really should have triggered more skepticism.
It’s not.
This is of course what you would have to say either way, no?