Since he doesn’t present sophisticated meta-meta-arguments, to me it just seems like Scott’s beliefs are harder to shift from contrarian to meta-contrarian.
That sounds right, though maybe as you go more meta it just gets harder to distinguish between any level and the level two levels down.
Since he doesn’t present sophisticated meta-meta-arguments, to me it just seems like Scott’s beliefs are harder to shift from contrarian to meta-contrarian.
That sounds right, though maybe as you go more meta it just gets harder to distinguish between any level and the level two levels down.