I was wondering the same thing. Scott Aaronson and Cosma Shalizi come to mind.
Since he doesn’t present sophisticated meta-meta-arguments, to me it just seems like Scott’s beliefs are harder to shift from contrarian to meta-contrarian.
That sounds right, though maybe as you go more meta it just gets harder to distinguish between any level and the level two levels down.
I was wondering the same thing. Scott Aaronson and Cosma Shalizi come to mind.
Since he doesn’t present sophisticated meta-meta-arguments, to me it just seems like Scott’s beliefs are harder to shift from contrarian to meta-contrarian.
That sounds right, though maybe as you go more meta it just gets harder to distinguish between any level and the level two levels down.