An algorithm would be, to put it simply, a list of instructions.
So are you saying that a human isn’t capable of following a list of instructions, and if so, do you mean any list of of instructions at all, or only some specific ones?
A human isnt capable.of following a list of instructions perfectly, relentlessly, forever. The problem with a pre comitment is sticking to it...whether you think of it as an algorithm.or a resolution or a promise or an oath.
You mean artificial neural networks? Which can also do things like running forever without resting. I think a citation is needed.
An algorithm would be, to put it simply, a list of instructions.
So are you saying that a human isn’t capable of following a list of instructions, and if so, do you mean any list of of instructions at all, or only some specific ones?
A human isnt capable.of following a list of instructions perfectly, relentlessly, forever. The problem with a pre comitment is sticking to it...whether you think of it as an algorithm.or a resolution or a promise or an oath.
So you’re saying humans can’t follow an algorithm that would require to be followed perfectly, relentlessly and forever.
But one-boxing is neither relentless, nor forever. That leaves perfection.
Are you suggesting that humans can’t perfectly one-box? If so, are you saying they can only imperfectly one-box?