The speed of light qualification is interesting, because it may relate to the static aspect of the “conscious tape”. The computer is conscious in its reference frame; but since that clock is stopped, that consciousness will never begin.
As I observe to Vladimir_M, the “speed of light” thing was a mistake. I just wanted to make sure no-one ever observed any output from the computer under any circumstances.
No, I still think it’s interesting. Define time as a function of entropy (eg., “one second” means the time over which entropy increases by a constant amount). Time is stopped in the piece of paper’s reference frame, because the paper is static, and therefore has no entropy change, and therefore no passage of time.
The speed of light qualification is interesting, because it may relate to the static aspect of the “conscious tape”. The computer is conscious in its reference frame; but since that clock is stopped, that consciousness will never begin.
As I observe to Vladimir_M, the “speed of light” thing was a mistake. I just wanted to make sure no-one ever observed any output from the computer under any circumstances.
You could always just hide it in the forest near the oft-considered fallen tree.
No, I still think it’s interesting. Define time as a function of entropy (eg., “one second” means the time over which entropy increases by a constant amount). Time is stopped in the piece of paper’s reference frame, because the paper is static, and therefore has no entropy change, and therefore no passage of time.