EDIT: saw your post. This is not a cognitive hazard in itself, but rather a possible interpretation of how the described situation could play out.
EDIT THE SECOND: Actually, now that I think of it, there’s a single novel component distinguishing it from the classic RB: the memory one. So much for leaving lines of retreat!
If you have any more dangerous ideas, please do contact me.
Please define “dangerous”.
Whichever definition you use or think people might use would suffice. More info
Well, now the next good question would be “why”.
EDIT: saw your post. This is not a cognitive hazard in itself, but rather a possible interpretation of how the described situation could play out.
EDIT THE SECOND: Actually, now that I think of it, there’s a single novel component distinguishing it from the classic RB: the memory one. So much for leaving lines of retreat!