They seem to be trying to increase the prestige of x-risk reduction.
I’m unsure how to evaluate them relative to other groups that are doing direct work on x-risk. If I recall correctly, some people I respect are on some of their “boards,” though I’m also unsure what to conclude from that.
They seem to be trying to increase the prestige of x-risk reduction.
What does that mean, specifically? As thomblake points out, some of the things they’ve associated with themselves are simultaneously ridiculous and useless, not prestigious. (They might appeal to fuzzy feelings of some people associated with futurism, in the manner of curing rare diseases in (fictional) kittens, and this way draw some funding their way.)
some people I respect are on some of their “boards,” though I’m also unsure what to conclude from that
This seems to be the main source of power for this organisation: they invite people to their “boards”, which has no apparent cost to neither those people nor the organization, and association with those people then draws both donations and further people for the “boards”.
They seem to be trying to increase the prestige of x-risk reduction.
I’m unsure how to evaluate them relative to other groups that are doing direct work on x-risk. If I recall correctly, some people I respect are on some of their “boards,” though I’m also unsure what to conclude from that.
What does that mean, specifically? As thomblake points out, some of the things they’ve associated with themselves are simultaneously ridiculous and useless, not prestigious. (They might appeal to fuzzy feelings of some people associated with futurism, in the manner of curing rare diseases in (fictional) kittens, and this way draw some funding their way.)
This seems to be the main source of power for this organisation: they invite people to their “boards”, which has no apparent cost to neither those people nor the organization, and association with those people then draws both donations and further people for the “boards”.