I like having reasonable suggestions—at the very least it’s a good idea to consider these things if I haven’t tried them before.
I don’t know why you seem to think it would be easy to find like-minded people, though. Inferential distance?
That seems to be hard by default, unless you’re living in an area with a high density of like-minded people.
Anyway, I am familiar with meetup.com. I have some meetups I could potentially participate in, though they seem to be mostly for people who want to socialize rather than specific groups for things I am interested in.
And simply meeting people at random seems like a poor way for me to try and find like-minded people. I might do that anyway for the social experience, but it seems to be a rather low return-on-investment strategy.
Random has to generally be deliberately planned for. Any kind of search is likely to be non-random, and there are multiple methods for increasing filtering even before you meet the person. A chess club will result in very different encounters than a soccer team. You could also change your culling methods when evaluating people to improve hits. It’s possible that you’re over or under filtering in casual encounters or that your search parameters are poorly tuned. Studying personality types can help with that. Still, there’s nothing better than just to increase your number of interactions.
I like having reasonable suggestions—at the very least it’s a good idea to consider these things if I haven’t tried them before.
I don’t know why you seem to think it would be easy to find like-minded people, though. Inferential distance?
That seems to be hard by default, unless you’re living in an area with a high density of like-minded people.
Anyway, I am familiar with meetup.com. I have some meetups I could potentially participate in, though they seem to be mostly for people who want to socialize rather than specific groups for things I am interested in.
And simply meeting people at random seems like a poor way for me to try and find like-minded people. I might do that anyway for the social experience, but it seems to be a rather low return-on-investment strategy.
Random has to generally be deliberately planned for. Any kind of search is likely to be non-random, and there are multiple methods for increasing filtering even before you meet the person. A chess club will result in very different encounters than a soccer team. You could also change your culling methods when evaluating people to improve hits. It’s possible that you’re over or under filtering in casual encounters or that your search parameters are poorly tuned. Studying personality types can help with that. Still, there’s nothing better than just to increase your number of interactions.
What are you interested in?