“I am not awake now” or “I do not exist”
It seems like these are both simply false with no paradox (at least whenever anyone considers them).
They are false, yet often considered as valid possibilities in anthropic problems. So in their reasoning there have to change the self-reference “I” to someone objectively defined.
It seems like these are both simply false with no paradox (at least whenever anyone considers them).
They are false, yet often considered as valid possibilities in anthropic problems. So in their reasoning there have to change the self-reference “I” to someone objectively defined.