I’m not sure what you are implying with this link—can you please expand? Are you saying that I’m choosing a least convenient possible world (and if so, how and what) or that 2-boxers are doing so?
Sorry, your comment was confusing and I didn’t properly concentrate on what you meant, so giving the LCPW link was a mistake, it doesn’t seem to apply.
You are finding technical flaws that are not essential to the intended sense of the thought experiment. Instead of making it uninteresting because of the potential flaws, make the thought experiment stronger by considering the case where these flaws are fixed.
I’m not sure what you are implying with this link—can you please expand? Are you saying that I’m choosing a least convenient possible world (and if so, how and what) or that 2-boxers are doing so?
Sorry, your comment was confusing and I didn’t properly concentrate on what you meant, so giving the LCPW link was a mistake, it doesn’t seem to apply.
No problem. I’ve expanded with the math explaining what I mean, hopefully that makes it less confusing what I was aiming at.
You are finding technical flaws that are not essential to the intended sense of the thought experiment. Instead of making it uninteresting because of the potential flaws, make the thought experiment stronger by considering the case where these flaws are fixed.