This is somewhat along the lines of the point I was trying to make with the Lazy River analogy.
I think the crux is that I’m arguing that because the “target” that evolution appears to be evolving towards is dependent on the state and differs as the state changes, it doesn’t seem right to refer to it as “internally represented”.
This is somewhat along the lines of the point I was trying to make with the Lazy River analogy.
I think the crux is that I’m arguing that because the “target” that evolution appears to be evolving towards is dependent on the state and differs as the state changes, it doesn’t seem right to refer to it as “internally represented”.