Or maybe the mainstream philosophy journals (isn’t that the pre-internet term for a blog?) should get on line, and start using a state-of-the-art interactive discussion system.
It’s pretty common these days for people to publish early drafts of their papers on their blog for commentary, and then they submit them to the journals. The philosophy world is highly interactive now, by way of the web.
I have great difficulty finding any philosophy published after 1960 other than post-modern philosophy, probably because my starting point is literary theory, which is completely confined to—the words “dominated” and even “controlled” are too weak—Marxian post-modern identity politics, which views literature only as a political barometer and tool.
Or maybe the mainstream philosophy journals (isn’t that the pre-internet term for a blog?) should get on line, and start using a state-of-the-art interactive discussion system.
It’s pretty common these days for people to publish early drafts of their papers on their blog for commentary, and then they submit them to the journals. The philosophy world is highly interactive now, by way of the web.
Is there some sort of philosophical/humanities counterpart to arXiv.org?
Not really, just Google Scholar.
hrrmph. http://philpapers.org/
Thanks!
I have great difficulty finding any philosophy published after 1960 other than post-modern philosophy, probably because my starting point is literary theory, which is completely confined to—the words “dominated” and even “controlled” are too weak—Marxian post-modern identity politics, which views literature only as a political barometer and tool.