Additional contributors to share the load of summarizing and searching seems like a good course, particularly since diverse contributors weighs against an information cascade.
This can be another window for feedback, asking readers to add any other relevant papers that they think are missed out from the newsletter. Then, if there are enough ones of sufficient quality, those can be linked to in the next newsletter, which acknowledgement to the commenter who posted it.
Comment thread for the question: How should I deal with the growing amount of AI safety research?
Additional contributors to share the load of summarizing and searching seems like a good course, particularly since diverse contributors weighs against an information cascade.
This can be another window for feedback, asking readers to add any other relevant papers that they think are missed out from the newsletter. Then, if there are enough ones of sufficient quality, those can be linked to in the next newsletter, which acknowledgement to the commenter who posted it.