We’ve never done this before, so it’s unclear how it will go. The House does have a “Speaker pro-tempore” backup, added in 2003, but it’s not clear
whether they are allowed to use this position to call votes other than
for a new speaker, or, if they would even if allowed:
In the meantime, other action on the House floor, including any
legislative business, is likely to be halted. House staff aides
believe the acting speaker may wield the gavel only to administer the
election of a new speaker.
But others argue that as acting speaker, Mr. McHenry can exercise
powers beyond overseeing a speaker’s race, as long as a majority
tolerates it.
“From an institutional House rules perspective, Speaker McHenry has
the powers of the speakership, and he will continue to exercise those
powers to the extent and degree that the majority party is willing to
tolerate,” said Josh C. Huder, a senior fellow at the Government
Affairs Institute at Georgetown University. “If he does something too
brash or too bold, they will rein him in. And that’s really the only
thing that’s governing his authority.”
House rules do not explicitly prohibit the interim speaker from
adopting the powers of an elected speaker. But the rule that led to
Mr. McHenry’s ascent was developed with only temporary absences in
mind, not a vacant chair, according to Stan M. Brand, the former
general counsel to the House. That leaves legal room for Mr. McHenry
to exercise broader powers, such as conducting legislative business,
if he chooses.—NYT, 2023-10-04
I’ve started a prediction
market, which as of this writing is at 20% with four traders:
I set the resolution conditions as:
Resolves true if McHenry uses his current pro-tempore position to
allow the House to schedule a vote for anything other than a new
Speaker. Resolves false otherwise, including if a new Speaker is
elected quickly enough that we don’t find out whether legislating
would have been acceptable.
I interpret this as a combination of whether it is strictly permitted
and how long it might take to elect a new Speaker: if one can be
elected quickly (market)
then there’s much need for McHenry to call votes. I think it’s probably legally allowed but socially not (yet) allowed, and the latter is more likely to change the longer we go without being able to elect a Speaker.
Can the House Legislate?
Link post
The US government is in a less functional position than usual:
Legislation requires (among other things) a plurality vote of the House of Representatives.
This requires the Speaker of the House to call a vote.
This requires a Speaker of the House.
The House removed its Speaker on Tuesday.
We’ve never done this before, so it’s unclear how it will go. The House does have a “Speaker pro-tempore” backup, added in 2003, but it’s not clear whether they are allowed to use this position to call votes other than for a new speaker, or, if they would even if allowed:
I’ve started a prediction market, which as of this writing is at 20% with four traders:
I set the resolution conditions as:
I interpret this as a combination of whether it is strictly permitted and how long it might take to elect a new Speaker: if one can be elected quickly (market) then there’s much need for McHenry to call votes. I think it’s probably legally allowed but socially not (yet) allowed, and the latter is more likely to change the longer we go without being able to elect a Speaker.