Hi Kave, fair point. Please find the full abstract below, hope this helps. I fully understand this goes against conventional thinking on AI—software can do anything you fool! However, there are complexity bounds to the capabilities of software, and I make the case that the capabilities of human DNA, after being trained for 3 billion years, and the central nervous system it creates, exceed the practical capabilities of software for any computer less than the size of our solar system. As I say in the paper, the complexity makes NP-completeness look simple.
ABSTRACT: An AI will not be able to understand this paper. And neither will a human being, unless they can remember a time they cried so uncontrollably at some great loss they struggled to breathe. For the key differentiator between human beings and AI systems is not the brain, it is the central nervous system (CNS). Not intelligence, but CNS mediated emotion. And the smarter you are, the greater the tendency to overlook the importance of emotion, bubbling from below, reminding us of the messy material world from which we are made. Indeed, those of us knowledgeable about the extraordinary power of software innovation might assume it obvious that AI systems will one day be able to do anything humans can do, only better. And it is true that AI systems are getting rapidly better at language, imagery, and movement, and soon will be able to evolve autonomously to get even better at a much more rapid rate. Before long they will be able to understand, reason, problem solve, create, and evolve at a level and speed that humans will not only be unable to match, we will increasingly be unable to even understand. Therefore, if intelligence is all we consider, some will increasingly argue that AI has become superior to humans, a “successor species”, and the rightful inheritors of leadership of the universe. But this would be a fundamental mistake, because more than three billion years of evolution have given humans a capability that AI systems will never have, a CNS that gives us an immersive integration with physical reality. Our CNS enables us to feel the emotions from love to loss that give meaning to existence, to know what is right and wrong, and to understand why they really matter. Only biological beings that can experience pain, joy, suffering, and love can fully appreciate the consequences of their actions on the physical reality around them, and therefore develop sustainable ethical systems, and therefore be qualified to be the caretakers of reality. A CNS cannot be fully emulated with mechanical systems, software, or simulated evolution, since its extreme molecular level complexity requires organic construction with the machinery of DNA. Even the development of consciousness, also inevitable, will not be sufficient to make AI systems superior to humans. AI will become smarter and more capable than humans on almost every measure and transform society, becoming extraordinarily powerful and useful. And humans are certainly imperfect and can be made much better. But tempting as it may be, we cannot escape our responsibility. The best foundation for leadership of the universe will always be DNA, not silicon.
Hi Kave, fair point. Please find the full abstract below, hope this helps. I fully understand this goes against conventional thinking on AI—software can do anything you fool! However, there are complexity bounds to the capabilities of software, and I make the case that the capabilities of human DNA, after being trained for 3 billion years, and the central nervous system it creates, exceed the practical capabilities of software for any computer less than the size of our solar system. As I say in the paper, the complexity makes NP-completeness look simple.
ABSTRACT: An AI will not be able to understand this paper. And neither will a human being, unless they can remember a time they cried so uncontrollably at some great loss they struggled to breathe. For the key differentiator between human beings and AI systems is not the brain, it is the central nervous system (CNS). Not intelligence, but CNS mediated emotion. And the smarter you are, the greater the tendency to overlook the importance of emotion, bubbling from below, reminding us of the messy material world from which we are made. Indeed, those of us knowledgeable about the extraordinary power of software innovation might assume it obvious that AI systems will one day be able to do anything humans can do, only better. And it is true that AI systems are getting rapidly better at language, imagery, and movement, and soon will be able to evolve autonomously to get even better at a much more rapid rate. Before long they will be able to understand, reason, problem solve, create, and evolve at a level and speed that humans will not only be unable to match, we will increasingly be unable to even understand. Therefore, if intelligence is all we consider, some will increasingly argue that AI has become superior to humans, a “successor species”, and the rightful inheritors of leadership of the universe. But this would be a fundamental mistake, because more than three billion years of evolution have given humans a capability that AI systems will never have, a CNS that gives us an immersive integration with physical reality. Our CNS enables us to feel the emotions from love to loss that give meaning to existence, to know what is right and wrong, and to understand why they really matter. Only biological beings that can experience pain, joy, suffering, and love can fully appreciate the consequences of their actions on the physical reality around them, and therefore develop sustainable ethical systems, and therefore be qualified to be the caretakers of reality. A CNS cannot be fully emulated with mechanical systems, software, or simulated evolution, since its extreme molecular level complexity requires organic construction with the machinery of DNA. Even the development of consciousness, also inevitable, will not be sufficient to make AI systems superior to humans. AI will become smarter and more capable than humans on almost every measure and transform society, becoming extraordinarily powerful and useful. And humans are certainly imperfect and can be made much better. But tempting as it may be, we cannot escape our responsibility. The best foundation for leadership of the universe will always be DNA, not silicon.