Testing. Where does this comment go?
wisnij
Karma: 39
...okay, that’s weird, I didn’t write that comment on this article (which is certainly not garbage). That was supposed to go on the crackpot post here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mTS4Pmgtxje7XqsKr/pirate-c-vacuum-energy-and-the-joules-hertz-constant A glitch in the commenting system, maybe?
[redacted; comment intended for a different post]
The title made me think this was another spam post at first.
> How scary would it be to realize that Satoshi Nakamoto is actually Unfriendly AI slowly creating an insane amount of wealth?
Extremely scary, and equally unlikely. It’s vastly more probable that there are more mundane reasons for the lack of withdrawals, e.g. he lost the thumb drive containing the necessary private keys, or deliberately destroyed the ability to access that wallet earlier in the project before it became clear how valuable it would become.
I’m assuming this post was meant to contain an actual link, but it doesn’t appear to currently.
The odds are low I would be able to participate, presently being on the wrong coast, but otherwise this is highly relevant to my interests.
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
Donald Knuth on the difference between theory and practice.
To summarize the summary: people are a problem.
I have occasional fantasies of men and enjoy some varieties of shounen-ai/yaoi, but I’m almost never attracted to men in real life, though there have been a couple of exceptions. I can never figure out if I should call myself straight or bi, though straight is probably closer to the mark.
Heteroflexible?
As another example, the Jargon file has a general definition of ‘hacker’:
(sense 7) One who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming or circumventing limitations.
That seems to fit pretty well.
I wouldn’t call it an error per se, but it’s definitely unidiomatic. Native speakers will consistently produce big brown spider far more often than ?brown big spider. Some languages enforce this more strictly than others, and in some the words can be deliberately moved out of the usual order for emphasis. (E.g. in such a language, a phrase equivalent to “brown big spider” would roughly mean “big brown spider”.)
There’s a really interesting comparison of popular keyboard layouts and proposed optimizations here: http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/
The author uses dynamic programming to calculate the various costs involved with typing (like finger movement, distance from home row, etc) and uses that to generate better layouts via simulated annealing. I thought it was a nicely quantitative take on a subject that is usually so subjective.
I live in the US. If I want to mail someone an item bigger than can be fit in a simple envelope, what is the procedure for determining the proper packaging, postage, etc? Will I have to actually bring the package to the post office to have them determine that? What is the protocol for doing so?
This is one of the things I struggled with a bit when first learning to cook for myself as well. It may help to keep in mind that some meats are safer than others. My heuristic goes roughly: chicken < pork < beef/lamb < fish, in increasing order of safety. If I’m handling raw chicken, I’ll wash my hands and utensils thoroughly in warm soapy water before doing anything else. If I’m handling fish, I’ll usually just give my hands a quick rinse. The same ordering also applies roughly to doneness; it’s a much bigger problem to have undercooked chicken than beef, for example.
A good starting place for meats is braised dishes like stews and pot roasts, because the typically long cooking time makes it hard to accidentally undercook something while still producing tasty results (as opposed to e.g. a steak grilled until it turns into shoe leather).
That “free will”, at least as commonly defined, is largely illusory.
That’s fine. I commented on this a few days ago but somehow it ended up getting posted to a different article, so I was trying to reproduce the issue.