troll

• trollApr 24, 2012, 10:42 PM

  1 point

  in reply to: thomblake’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (2012)

  I have and I have submitted an application.

• trollApr 24, 2012, 10:25 PM

  3 points

  in reply to: DSimon’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (2012)

  If you mean ‘against people who are contrarian’, no. If you mean ‘for popular opinions’, no.

• trollApr 17, 2012, 10:39 PM

  13 points

  in reply to: Oscar_Cunningham’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (2012)

  There are a few other reasons I could be formatting my introduction that way, such as being bad at English or writing in general. I used “minimalist” both as a heads up for the format and to draw away from the other possible explanations.

• trollApr 17, 2012, 9:31 PM

  16 points

  in reply to: shokwave’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (2012)

  No.

• trollApr 17, 2012, 8:34 PM

  22 points

  on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (2012)

  minimalist, 17, white, male, autodidact, atheist, libertarian, california, hacker, studying computer science, reading sequences, intellectual upbringing, 1 year bayesian rationalist, motivation deficient, focusing on skills, was creating something similar to bayesian rationality before conversion, have read hpmor (not intro to lw), interested in contributing to ai research in the future

  What links here?

  • thomblake's comment on Wel­come to Less Wrong! (2012) by orthonormal (Apr 18, 2012, 11:56 PM; 12 points)
  • Richard_Kennaway's comment on How can we get more and bet­ter LW con­trar­i­ans? by Wei Dai (Apr 18, 2012, 11:03 PM; 11 points)