So there is really no purpose to every read something non-fiction besides efficient intake of information? Is that what we really believe?
rogersbacon
Karma: 481
The Soul of the Writer (on LLMs, the psychology of writers, and the nature of intelligence)
“The Need for Long-term Research”—Seeds of Science call for reviewers
The One Heresy to Rule Them All
“Perspective: Focused-Ultrasound Guided Neuropeptide Delivery as a Novel Therapeutic Approach in Psychiatry” (Seeds of Science call for reviewers)
How to Escape From the Simulation (Seeds of Science)
“How to Escape from the Simulation”—Seeds of Science call for reviewers
I could not care less whether or not any reads this.
Not going to be everyone’s vibe that’s fine, but if you’ve forgotten that there are other reasons to read something besides maximally efficient intake of information then that’s a problem...
Efficient communication/intake of information is not the only reason that people write or read…
Is Progress Real?
MAKE IT BETTER (a poetic demonstration of the banality of GPT-3)
“Are Experiments Possible?” Seeds of Science call for reviewers
there is no main idea and I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything. It is nothing.
“probably wrong” thank you so much for this
Nothing.
Thank you for your review!
They do spend considerable time discussing that in the article
What about this is hard to read? I’m confused.