I felt this was a confused question for the reasons you’ve defined and so I’ve voted other.
RichardHughes
I voted ‘other’ to the original question. I would vote ‘accept platonism’ to this question.
Presuming I value the lives of all the people involved equally, I turn on to the side track. If I have a strong reason not to let the person on the side track die—they’re a relative, I know them well, they owe me money, I’m in love with them, whatever—I let it go straight.
This is a really easy problem if you accept that you’re only a marginally good person at best.
I’m not sure how anyone could argue that aesthetic value is objective when humans regularly disagree about the aesthetic value of things. It’s a pretty stern counterexample.
Can you provide more info about the event?
It strikes me that performing this experiment on people, then revealing what has occurred, may be a potentially useful method of enlightening people to the flaws of their cognition. How might we design a ‘kit’ to reproduce this sleight of hand in the field, so as to confront people with it usefully?
I don’t see a point or thesis in your statement for me to react to beyond the situation itself. What are you getting at? What argument are you seeking to make?
I’m planning to be there. I’m going to try to bring my shy boyfriend, but I dunno how that’ll go.
I have no ability to do any actual random selection, but you raise a good point—some focus group testing on laymen would be a good precaution to take before settling on a name.
I was literally just about to post a thread asking about the fixation on putting numerical values on our confidences all the time, then I saw this. So, thanks for that. Wrapped that little dilemma right up.
Agreed that people are very likely to misunderstand it—however, even the obvious, naive reading still creates a useful approximation of what it is you guys actually do. I would consider that misreading to be a feature, not a flaw, because the layman’s reading produces a useful layman’s understanding.
I voted ‘other’ and downvoted the question. Lordy, what the heck are you doin’ bringing this in here? D: