A major problem with Robin’s theory is that it seems to predict things like, We should find ourselves in a universe in which lots of decoherence events have already taken place,” which tendency does not seem especially apparent.
Actually the theory suggests we should find ourselves in a state with near the least feasible number of past decoherence events
I don’t understand this—doesn’t decoherence occur all the time, in every quantum interaction between all amplitudes all the time? So, like for every amptlitude separate enough to be a “particle” in the universe (=factor) every planck time it will decohere with other factors?
Or did I misunderstand something big time here?
Cheers, Peter
I asked this question in the Born Probabilites post but it didn’t get answered so I try again because I think it is important, and it concerns decoherence so it fits here:
A major problem with Robin’s theory is that it seems to predict things like, We should find ourselves in a universe in which lots of decoherence events have already taken place,” which tendency does not seem especially apparent. Actually the theory suggests we should find ourselves in a state with near the least feasible number of past decoherence eventsI don’t understand this—doesn’t decoherence occur all the time, in every quantum interaction between all amplitudes all the time? So, like for every amptlitude separate enough to be a “particle” (bad talk, I know ;-) in the universe (=factor) every planck time it will decohere with other factors?
So: all possible factorizations (=decoherence) occur, and not only when one prepares a quantum experiment.
Or did I misunderstand something big time here?
Cheers, Peter