Sure, I will message you the zoom link.
pepe_prime
Karma: 166
I extinguished 4 such behaviors in the last couple years. I made a tally every time I did the behavior (on my phone). So the TAP was
Do behavior → Open phone
At the end of each week I gave my friend some money—a dime for each tally. Several years ago I tried to extinguish nose-picking and succeeded, but relapsed after 6-12 months, and basically trying again in a similar way worked a second time.
Like mr-hire I like the topic choice and think lesswrong would get value out of it.
However, you included 0 image links, as far as I can tell. If I’m an unfashionable male, how do I know what a “light” or “dark” navy is? How do I know what a “chino” is?
Also this entire post could have been a linkpost to r/malefashionadvice, which appears to be the source of most of your advice.
You might want to advertise this on LesserWrong, which is somewhat officially the new site.
Really fun writing style. Nit: Quotes, e.g. the one by Darwin about the Silurian, should be distinguished in some way.
I have taken the survey.
[Survey Taken Thread]
By ancient tradition, if you take the survey you may comment saying you have done so here, and people will upvote you and you will get karma.
Let’s make these comments a reply to this post. That way we continue the tradition, but keep the discussion a bit cleaner.
Minor nit: The emotional intelligence example seems to have no effect.
Moved to Apr 28 to avoid Easter!
Thanks, these are excellent highlight reels.
Self-explanatory title. The list is rather rambling and not terribly comprehensive, but I found it worthwhile nonetheless.
Here’s a summary, of sorts. OP also discusses what can be done about manipulation, in a way relevant for lesswrong.
When I first tried to post this I accidentally saved as draft first and it ended up pointing to itself, so I’m reposting. Thanks satt.
Thanks. Not sure how I caused that, or how to fix it, so I’m deleting and reposting the link.
Self-explanatory title. The list is rather rambling and not terribly comprehensive, but I found it worthwhile nonetheless.
Here’s a summary, of sorts. OP also discusses what can be done about manipulation, in a way relevant for lesswrong.
Perhaps the key takeaway here is the useful word ‘pabulum’.
ping
Really fantastic that you started an effective charity! Everything about your approach is awesome. I hope the rest of your top 8 get test driven (by you or others) someday as well.
Generally I agree with the spreadsheeting concept. There’s also Guesstimate for when your weights and uncertainties are numerical.
I don’t think there’s a mailing list yet. We could move some or all of the meetups to evenings/weekends if there’s interest. Help me gather preferred times.
David_Kristoffersson has proposed a meetup this Friday. I’ve set it for 17:00 in light of your comment.
Yes, in the KTH computer science building.
Yes, it’s UTC+2. It’s 15:00 local time.
Awesome, thanks! Also, I’m glad to see there are lesswrongers about.
Not sure if your comment is critical or amused. This naming scheme is the standard I’ve been using for a while but I could add something like “Story: ” or “Stockholm SSC: ”.