ML research eng
Looking for new a new position!!
notrishi
Karma: 0
If blocks of text could be properly encoded and decoded vae style, this would not only improve compute requirements for transformers (since you would only have to predict latents), but it might also offer a sort of “idea” autoregression, where a thought is slowly formulated, then decoded into a sequence of tokens. Alas, it seems there is a large chunk of research left unresolved here; I doubt that researchers are willing to allocate time to this.
notrishi’s Shortform
There has been a lot of recent talk on diffusion models implicitly autoregressing in the frequency domain (from low-high, coarse to fine features). I find absolutely no reason that we cannot explicitly autoregress on frequencies using fft and casual attention in the frequency domain for the batched loss. I’ll probably attempt this at some point.
I have not read this before, thanks. Reminds me a lot of Normal Computings extended mind models. I think these are good ideas worth testing, and there are many others within the same vein. My intuition suggests that any idea that pursues a gradual increase in global information prior to decoding is a worthwhile experiment, whether through your method or similar (doesn’t necessarily have to be diffusion on embeddings).
Aesthetically I just don’t like that transformers have an information collapse on each token and don’t allow backtracking (without significant effort in a custom sampler). In my ideal world we could completely reconstruct prose from embeddings and thus simply autoregress in latent space. I think Yann Lecun has discussed this with JEPA as well.
I originally had my thought from a frequency autoregression experiment I had, where I used a causal transformer on the frequency domain of images (to sort of replicate diffusion). This gradually adds information globally to all pixels due to the nature of the ifft, yet still has an autoregressive backend.