Medarla

• Medarla 10 May 2018 23:14 UTC

  −17 points

  in reply to: Elo’s comment on: Some­thing is rot­ten in the chan­nel of Slack

  Just do it, then. Go and enjoy your personal fan club.

• Medarla 10 May 2018 22:18 UTC

  −15 points

  in reply to: Elo’s comment on: Some­thing is rot­ten in the chan­nel of Slack

  Appeal to the authority is a bad, invalid argument. However, it doesn’t look like you give a flying duck for good argumentation at all.

  So far, your “garden” looks like an extremely toxic place that has nothing to do with rational thinking. I definitely don’t mind that you do whatever you want with your personal channel, just don’t use this misleading title. It’s a not channel about rationality, it’s one certain guy’s personal fan club.

  And by the way, I remember you wrote that you don’t ban people often. Now I think that you lied about this too.

• Medarla 10 May 2018 21:16 UTC

  −14 points

  in reply to: Elo’s comment on: Some­thing is rot­ten in the chan­nel of Slack

  Courtier’s response: https://​​en.wikipedia.org/​​wiki/​​Courtier%27s_Reply

• Medarla 10 May 2018 20:25 UTC

  −4 points

  in reply to: Elo’s comment on: Some­thing is rot­ten in the chan­nel of Slack

  Well, I don’t have any idea what to do with the guy who just lies into my face. Especially when he got the power to ban me just because he feels like that.

  Apparently, lesswrong.com is not a place for any discussions.

• Medarla 10 May 2018 20:14 UTC

  −4 points

  on: Some­thing is rot­ten in the chan­nel of Slack

  occasionally appending “only an idiot would say that” to your statements

  Well, this is just a lie. Other points are misleading or outright made up too, but this one is particularly blatant.

  On the other hand, jollybard call me a jerk and an idiot for a few times, and you paid zero attention to it.

  But who cares, right? Long live the echo-chamber.

Some­thing is rot­ten in the chan­nel of Slack