The most apparent way to talk about such topics here is to completely overhaul the terminology and canonical examples.
And then do something with the resulting referential void.
Certainly not a task for group of less than four people, and likely not a task for group of less than 40.
Is your attempt to single-handedly contribute, with all the costs it imposes, likely enough to give a significant positive result?
If some specific projects (...Rationality Curriculum) become a success, rationality will be much more widespread and, as a result, much less defined.
And 50 years is a bit too much for any notable concentrations of probability.