If you mean a self-aware AI, then I doubt that the creator will have much to say if the artificial person will be good or bad. How much blame do you put on the parents of a killer?
The actions of a self-aware AI should be referred to Metaphysics and Axiology.
If you mean an automata. then we have the laws already. Why would anyone would want to create a machine to break them? The creator will definitely be responsible. :(
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
I visualize a time when we will be to robots what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines. Claude E. Shannon
Information is the resolution of uncertainty. Claude Shannon
Information: the negative reciprocal value of probability. Claude Shannon
JUGGLING THEOREM proposed by Claude E. Shannon
(F+D)H=(V+D)N
where F is the time a ball spends in the air, D is the time a ball spends in a hand, V is the time a hand is vacant, N is the number of balls juggled, and H is the number of hands.