Perhaps cognition is a collection of problems with exponential complexity. In that case we would see some success, but not be able to scale to much really useful.Also, the brain would have to not be a Turing machine, and the strong physical Church-Turing thesis would be false.
Seems simpler maybe?
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Perhaps cognition is a collection of problems with exponential complexity.
In that case we would see some success, but not be able to scale to much really useful.
Also, the brain would have to not be a Turing machine, and the strong physical Church-Turing thesis would be false.
Seems simpler maybe?