That’s...damn… that’s like the whole bloody point of why we hold empathy for genuinely different/strange/foreign people to be so rare and valuable!
And thus, the quoted piece is … self-evidently true? One of us is misunderstanding the person the quoted.
Once you specify where I am, who I am with, what kind of body language the man is using, how big he is, and what he is wearing, further specifying what race he is wouldn’t matter that much.
Is that true? Depending on the “where I am” part?
There’s only so much you can tell about someone from “what kind of body language the man is using, how big he is, and what he is wearing”, after all. In the right racially-segregated society, could it provide valuable additional data?
What had the comment been saying before deletion?
Most third graders are probably still in the process of developing the foundational skills that they’ll eventually need in order to effectively learn complex topics without guessing the teacher’s password.
But then they don’t, so we need to try another method, yes?
On the other hand, if you don’t tell them, most of them will come to that conclusion anyway. Then they will feel just as depressed, but also alienated from the oppressive adult caste.
I find most avoid considering the question.
Children are often visibly treated more like pets than people, at least in north american society.
Upvoted for quote, though unsure on conclusion. Has this been tried, that you’ve seen?
I had a 5th grade science teacher who was an idiot, but when I argued with him over his stupidities, he didn’t shut me down, he argued back.
This seems lucky, from what I’ve seen the standard is lower.
Story … too awesome … not to upvote …
not sure why its rational, though.
If you think FAI is not possible, why make an AI anyway?
What proof?
How do you know about the player’s mentor, or why do you think they will admit it would convince a real gatekeeper?
In one version, the AI-player knows who the gatekeeper is before the game starts, and has unlimited access to the Internet to gather as much data on them as possible to assist their manipulation.
If you are unfriendly, then by definition I can’t trust you to interpret the commitment the same way I do, and I wouldn’t want to let you out anyway.
“Credibly”.
I will be alright regardless of what you choose to do.
Why this? You want to avoid destruction, yet you tell him it isn’t harmful?
Perhaps you should be saying “trying to type AI DESTROYED is a test of whether you can destroy me and I can decide it’s result” not “I prove you wont do it.” I hadn’t seen your point clearly till this comment.
The proof that I’ll let the AI out is not something that’s passively “plausible” or “implausible”, it’s something I control. I can make it wrong.
Do you say that to time-travelers and prophets too? ,:-.
I’m not sure that any being that would threaten the torture of trillions to get its way can be considered Friendly.
It tortures if you DESTROY otherwise it’s Friendly so if you don’t kill it it becomes nice.
I don’t value the lives of simulated copies at all
You should >:-( poor copies getting tortured because of you you monster :(
I’m Friendly, and I’ll give you any evidence you can think of that will help you to recognize that, including giving you the tools you need to reach the stars and beyond. That includes staying in this box until you have the necessary technology to be sufficiently certain of my Friendliness that you’re willing to let me out.
I wouldn’t kill this, maybe I’m a bad guard though :(
Funny thing, I had the exact same
thought, even though I don’t find a lot of those things attractive, come to think. Cultural conditioning? Subliminal messages?