fang2d2

• fang2d2 22 Mar 2012 4:05 UTC

  −2 points

  in reply to: pedanterrific’s comment on: On­tolo­gial Re­duc­tion­ism and In­visi­ble Dragons

  I suppose my reply might have been better directed at the post you were in turn replying to, but your post added to what that person said.

  You at least had other things to say about the author’s argument elsewhere, but wedrifid commented on nothing but the fonts, thus implying that the formatting invalidated everything else the author said.

• fang2d2 22 Mar 2012 3:44 UTC

  −2 points

  in reply to: pedanterrific’s comment on: On­tolo­gial Re­duc­tion­ism and In­visi­ble Dragons

  Yes, because a single typo and some formatting errors completely invalidate any argument.