Crownless_Prince

• Crownless_Prince 22 Mar 2016 0:16 UTC

  −1 points

  in reply to: Lumifer’s comment on: AlphaGo ver­sus Lee Sedol

  At which point the humans running this NN will notice that it likes to go around risk control measures and will… persuade it that it’s a bad idea.

  How? By instituting more complex control measures? Then you’re back to the problem Kaj mentioned above.

• Crownless_Prince 22 Mar 2016 0:05 UTC

  1 point

  in reply to: Stuart_Armstrong’s comment on: Ge­netic “Na­ture” is cul­tural too

  Yes, but this means that a lot of very rich people are very incorrect as to what is important for their wealth.

  They know about the factors they can control. After all, those are the ones they actually focus on.

• Crownless_Prince 21 Mar 2016 23:58 UTC

  −1 points

  in reply to: Lumifer’s comment on: AlphaGo ver­sus Lee Sedol

  So? An opaque neural net would quickly learn how to get around trade size restrictions if given the proper motivations.

• Crownless_Prince 21 Mar 2016 23:50 UTC

  −3 points

  in reply to: Stuart_Armstrong’s comment on: Ge­netic “Na­ture” is cul­tural too

  Consider that if it had been the opposite—IQ was more a personal benefit than a country benefit—we’d be explaining it as “obviously smart people benefit themselves at the expense of others”.

  Yes, it’s called basing your beliefs on the evidence.