Chi Nguyen

Karma: 916

Working independently on making AI systems reason safely about decision theory and acausal interactions, collaborating with Caspar Oesterheld and Emery Cooper.

I try to check the LessWrong infrequently. If you wanna get in touch, you can use my admonymous link and leave your email address there, so I can reply to you! (If you don’t include some contact details in your message, I can’t reply)

You can also just send me thoughts and questions anonymously!

How others can help me

Be interested in working on/implementing ideas from research on acausal cooperations! Or connect me with people who might be.

How I can help others

Ask me about acausal stuff!

Or any of my background: Before doing independent research, I worked for the Center on Long-Term Risk on s-risk reduction projects (hiring, community building, and grantmaking.) Previously, I was a guest manager at the EA Infrastructure Fund (2021), did some research for 1 Day Sooner on Human Challenge Trials for Covid vaccines (2020), did the summer research fellowship at FHI writing about IDA (2019), worked a few hours a week for CEA on local groups mentoring for a few months (2018), and helped a little bit with organizing EA Oxford (2018/19). I studied PPE at Oxford (2018-2021) and psychology in Freiburg (2015-2018.)

I also have things to say about mental health and advice for taking a break from work.

Chi Nguyen Feb 11, 2025, 8:18 PM
1 point
0
in reply to: Rauno Arike’s comment on: Chi Nguyen’s Shortform
My current guess is that occasional volunteers are totally fine! There’s some onboarding cost but mostly, the cost on our side scales with the number of argument-critique pairs we get. Since the whole point is to have critiques of a large variety of quality, I don’t expect the nth argument-critque pair we get to be much more useable than the 1st one. I might be wrong about this one and change my mind as we try this out with people though!

(Btw I didn’t get a notification for your comment, so maybe better to dm if you’re interested.)

Chi Nguyen Feb 9, 2025, 8:49 PM
20 points
0
on: Chi Nguyen’s Shortform
Looking for help with an acausal safety project. If you’re interested or know someone who might be, it would be really great if you let me know/share
1. Help with acausal research and get mentoring to learn about decision theory
- Motivation: Caspar Oesterheld (inventor/discoverer of ECL/MSR), Emery Cooper and I are doing a project where we try to get LLMs to help us with our acausal research.
  - Our research is ultimately aimed at making future AIs acausally safe.
- Project: In a first step, we are trying to train an LLM classifier that evaluates critiques of arguments. To do so, we need a large number of both good and bad arguments about decision theory (and other areas of Philosophy.)
- How you’ll learn: If you would like to learn about decision theory, anthropics, open source game theory, …, we supply you with a curriculum. There’s a lot of leeway for what exactly you want to learn about. You go through the readings.
  - If you already know things and just want to test your ideas, you can optionally skip this step.
- Your contribution: While doing your readings, you, write up critiques of arguments you read.
- Bottom-line: We get to use your arguments/critiques for our projects and you get our feedback on them. (We have to read and label them for the project anyway.)
- Logistics: Unfortunately, you’d be a volunteer. I might be able to pay you a small amount out-of-pocket, but it’s not going to be very much. Caspar and Em are both university employed and I am similar in means to an independent researcher. We are also all non-Americans based in the US which makes it harder for us to acquire money for projects and such for boring and annoying reasons.
- Why are we good mentors: Caspar has dozens of publications on related topics. Em has a handful. And I have been around.
2. Be a saint and help with acausal research by doing tedious manual labor and getting little in return
We also need help with various grindy tasks that aren’t super helpful for learning, e.g. turning pdfs with equations etc. into sensible txts to feed to LLMs. If you’re motivated to help with that, we would be extremely grateful.

Chi Nguyen’s Shortform

Chi NguyenFeb 9, 2025, 8:41 PM

1 point

2 comments1 min readLW link

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems

Caspar Oesterheld, Ethan Perez and Chi Nguyen

Dec 16, 2024, 10:42 PM

49 points

1 comment2 min readLW link

(arxiv.org)

What is malevolence? On the nature, measurement, and distribution of dark traits

David Althaus, Chi Nguyen and Clare

Oct 23, 2024, 8:41 AM

93 points

23 comments1 min readLW link

The case for more Alignment Target Analysis (ATA)

Chi Nguyen and ThomasCederborg

Sep 20, 2024, 1:14 AM

27 points

13 comments17 min readLW link

Chi Nguyen Jun 20, 2024, 4:52 PM
21 points
23
in reply to: William_S’s comment on: Ilya Sutskever created a new AGI startup
I don’t trust Ilya Sutskever to be the final arbiter of whether a Superintelligent AI design is safe and aligned. We shouldn’t trust any individual,
I’m not sure how I feel about the whole idea of this endeavour in the abstract—but as someone who doesn’t know Ilya Sutskever and only followed the public stuff, I’m pretty worried that he in particular runs it if decision-making is on the “by an individual” level and even if not. Running this safely will likely require lots of moral integrity and courage. The board drama made it look to me like Ilya disqualified himself from having enough of that.
Lightly held because I don’t know the details but just from the public stuff I’ve seen I don’t know why I should at all believe that Ilya has sufficient moral integrity and courage for this project even if he might “mean well” at the moment.

Chi Nguyen May 20, 2024, 2:12 PM
12 points
7
on: OpenAI: Exodus
Greg Brockman and Sam Altman (cosigned):
[...]
First, we have raised awareness of the risks and opportunities of AGI so that the world can better prepare for it. We’ve repeatedly demonstrated the incredible possibilities from scaling up deep learning
chokes on coffee

Chi Nguyen May 20, 2024, 1:50 PM
17 points
2
on: OpenAI: Exodus
From my point of view, of course profit maximizing companies will…maximize profit. It never was even imaginable that these kinds of entities could shoulder such a huge risk responsibly.
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t Conjecture legally a company? Maybe their profit model isn’t actually foundation models? Not actually trying to imply things, just thought the wording was weird in that context and was wondering whether Conjecture has a different legal structure than I thought.

Chi Nguyen May 20, 2024, 1:30 PM
4 points
0
on: OpenAI: Exodus
minus Cullen O’Keefe who worked on policy and legal (so was not a clear cut case of working on safety),
I think Cullen was on the same team as Daniel (might be misremembering), so if you count Daniel, I’d also count Cullen. (Unless you wanna count Daniel because he previously was more directly part of technical AI safety research at OAI.)

Chi Nguyen May 16, 2024, 11:37 AM
1 point
0
in reply to: Maxime Riché’s comment on: How to do conceptual research: Case study interview with Caspar Oesterheld
Yes! Edited the main text to make it clear

Chi Nguyen May 15, 2024, 1:02 PM
2 points
0
in reply to: ektimo’s comment on: How to do conceptual research: Case study interview with Caspar Oesterheld
The “entity giving the payout” in practice for ECL would be just the world states you end up in and requires you to care about the environment of the person you’re playing the PD with.
So, defecting might be just optimising my local environment for my own values and cooperating would be optimising my local environment for some aggregate of my own values and the values of the person I’m playing with. So, it only works if there are positive-sum aggregates and if each player cares about what the other does to their local environment.

How to do conceptual research: Case study interview with Caspar Oesterheld

Chi NguyenMay 14, 2024, 3:09 PM

48 points

5 comments9 min readLW link

Chi Nguyen May 3, 2024, 6:34 PM
4 points
0
on: Which skincare products are evidence-based?
I watched and read a ton of Lab Muffin Beauty Science when I got into skincare. Apart from Sunscreen, I think a lot of it is trial and error with what has good short-term effects. I’m not sure about long-term effects at all tbh. Lab Muffin Beauty Science is helpful for figuring out your skin type, leads for which products to try first, and how to use them. (There’s a fair number of products you wanna ramp up slowly and even by the end only use on some days.)

Chi Nguyen May 2, 2024, 6:13 PM
16 points
3
on: Please stop publishing ideas/insights/research about AI
Are there types of published alignment research that you think were (more likely to be) good to publish? If so, I’d be curious to see a list.

Chi Nguyen Apr 23, 2024, 9:10 PM
1 point
5
on: (When) Should you work through the night when inspiration strikes you?
Agree-vote: I generally tend to choose work over sleep when I feel particularly inspired to work.
Disagree-vote: I generally tend to choose to sleep over work when even when I feel particularly inspired to work.
Any other reaction, new answer or comment, or no reaction of any kind: Neither of the two descriptions above fit.
I considered making four options to capture the dimension of whether you endorse your behaviour or not but decided against it. Feel free to supplement this information.

[Question] (When) Should you work through the night when inspiration strikes you?

Chi NguyenApr 23, 2024, 9:07 PM

21 points

4 comments1 min readLW link

Slim overview of work one could do to make AI go better (and a grab-bag of other career considerations)

Chi NguyenMar 20, 2024, 11:17 PM

9 points

1 comment1 min readLW link

AI things that are perhaps as important as human-controlled AI

Chi NguyenMar 3, 2024, 6:07 PM

55 points

4 comments1 min readLW link

Chi Nguyen Mar 1, 2024, 8:23 PM
1 point
0
in reply to: Dan.Oblinger’s comment on: Cooperating with aliens and (distant) AGIs: An ECL explainer
Interesting. The main thing that pops out for me is that it feels like your story is descriptive while we try to be normative? I.e. it’s not clear to me from what you say whether you would recommend to humans to act in this cooperative way towards distant aliens, but you seem to expect that they will do/are doing so. Meanwhile, I would claim that we should act cooperatively in this way but make no claims about whether humans actually do so.
Does that seem right to you or am I misunderstanding your point?