How did this end up going? Any chance of us getting an update?
Bryan-san
Karma: 239
I have several recommendations.
First things first, I strongly recommend reading this blog post by Siderea on the possible values of attending University. The difference between a public and private high school for you may very well be similar to the difference between a lower and higher status university. This article will expand your list of possible benefits and detriments to the two (and more) options. Spending lots of time around higher status and higher income people has a lot of benefits that aren’t immediately obvious. (I’m assuming the private school is higher status here. I don’t know your area and there are certainly low status private schools out there.)
I recommend adding these ideas to your considerations, reading what ScottL describes below, and then doing Goal Factoring on the entire question. Goal Factoring is a very useful CFAR technique that works well in this exact type of situation. I don’t see a great write-up for it online and I’m not sure how great that link is at describing it. However, if you’d like to hear a more thorough explanation and practice the technique after you’ve looked into this stuff you’re welcome to PM me your skype username and we can chat about it sometime soon. (I’m decent at debugging, but if you get any other offers you should definitely take those up as well as or instead of mine.)
And I also recommend going and meeting some people who actually attend the public high school or just taking a day off and wandering into the place to see what it’s actually like in person. You may be slightly dissatisfied at your current location but would absolutely hate the public high school. (Bullying isn’t a myth, the grass is always greener on the other side, etc.) The year you’re in will also have a lot of consequences in what your experience is like since many friendships are already formed and group boundaries defined by the end of the 2nd year (if not the 1st).
Last but not least, if you don’t already have a clear answer and want a hundred other things to consider (or you’ve decided on an answer and are ready for your next challenge) you should take a look at the Starting University Advice Repository thread. One of the primary values of High School is preparing you for and enabling your progression in University. This includes socially (for relationships), academically (for knowledge), building study habits, developing your writing, developing interpersonal skills, acquiring culture (acculturating), making use of the high school’s prestige, and more (as described in Siderea’s post linked above).
Does that include the grade inflation at major universities or the universities with specific classes that have their difficultly increased and grading deflated so that they fail out students at a more regular rate? (I know some universities do the second type on the introductory science courses while others do it at 3rd year courses.) Or were you referring to something else like bribes?
AlphaGo will be playing against a top Korean player, Lee Se-dol, in March. Lee is a 9 dan player (highest tier) whereas Fan Hui was only a 2 dan. AlphaGo beat Fan 5-0 so it’s hard to tell how good of a player it is in comparison. I’m very interested in seeing the results of the next match.
Note: There seems to be some misreporting on the rank of Lee Se-dol on some American news sites. He’s definitely a top Korean and world player, but I don’t think he’s #1 right now. Someone else is welcome to correct me on this.
Very impressive article by Sidrea on the real reasons and value behind university
http://siderea.livejournal.com/1261773.html?format=light
I think that even making guesses about someone’s identity on an anonymous account is in very poor taste and actively discourages participation by people who are attempting to use anonymity as a tool to, “share [their] mind authentically”. I consider that sort of thing
doxingsimilar to doxing because it takes actions on identity outside of the anonymous person’s terms. These days I’m generally against anything that has the potential to decrease activity on LW. (And even if Clarity is a generally ridiculous poster, he does foster discussions on the site at the very least.)
I think it’s far from ideal, but that
doxingthings similar to doxing are at least 100x worse as a community norm.
I think there is very high value in sincerity, that both of the qualities you’ve described are heavily attached to sincerity, and that the effective and regular signaling of sincerity is going to be pretty much impossible to maintain without actually being sincere. If you really want to be effective in these areas, you might try to become easygoing and less selfish rather than trying to figure out how to fake those things.
For both if true and if not true: do you think posting this publicly is productive or a good idea when Clarity just said he didn’t want to cross pollinate?
What % do you define as “many”? Those percentages of content already known sound very high to me in regards to the first 1/3rd of the Sequences. (I’m still working on the rest so can’t comment there.) Also, they can use the Article Summaries to test out whether they’ve seen the concept before and then read the full article or not. I don’t recommend just reading the summaries though. I think a person doing that would be doing a disservice to themselves because of the reasons supplied by Vaniver above.
If someone has anxiety about a topic, I suggest they go after all the normal anxiety treating methods. SSC has a post about Things that Sometimes Work If You Have Anxeity, though actually going to see a therapist and getting professional help would likely help more.
If he wants to try exposure therapy, good results have apparently recently occurred from doing that while on propranalol.
Immediate ideas that come to mind: lots of CFAR goal-oriented techniques like goal factoring, pre-hindsight, murphyjitsu, seeking strategic updates, and urge propagation. You can learn those at CFAR itself or Anna might be writing up something on them at some point during this year.
From other stuff I’ve been exposed to: Generating 3rd option alternatives Noticing and rejecting Fool’s Choices (presented with A but not B and B but not A, which you reject and then find a way to obtain both A and B) being sure to write down actual models for decision trees and assign probabilities to them finding people who failed in the past and avoid their failures thinking about what someone cleverer or craftier than you would do asking someone who is cleverer and craftier than you what they would do etc.
In what specific areas do you think LWers are making serious mistakes by ignoring or not accepting strong enough priors from experts?
I’m curious: what were your direct motivations for posting this in a thread instead of as a comment in the Open or Media threads?
This article looks like a good Part 1 of Many. I would normally expect this article to be followed by several more that go into detail about what good, rational planning actually looks like and how to do effective and useful research on topics like these.
Breaking things down into smaller parts and doing research sound like good ideas #1 and #2 of 20 or 30 needed to do really awesome planning.
Nate Soares’ recent post “The Art of Response” on Minding Our Way talks about effective response patterns that people develop to deal with problems. What response patterns do you use in life or in your field of expertise that you have found to be quite effective?
Finally completed my dieting goal of losing 20% of my original body weight.
You put the person’s name on both sides of the badge (this is a flat badge on a lanyard) so that if it gets turned around it’s still visible.
This is for SquirrelInHell. rot13 to avoid spoilers.
Gur frevrf vf n engvbany svpgvba orpnhfr Yrk Yhgube’f ernpgvba gb Fhcrezna’f npgvivgvrf vf gur fnzr nf lbhef. Ur fnlf, “guvf vf vzcbffvoyr onfrq ba xabja culfvpf” gura “tvira gung vasbezngvba, jung gur uryy vf npghnyyl tbvat ba?”. Gur fgbel cebprrqf sebz gung birenyy fpvragvsvp crefcrpgvir bajneq.