My guess is that the hard “Pause” advocates are focussed on optimizing for actions that are “necessary” and “sufficient” for safety, but at the expense of perhaps not being politically or practically “feasible”.
Whereas, “Responsible Scaling Policies” advocates may instead describe actions that are “necessary”, and more “feasible” however are less likely to be “sufficient”.
The crux of this disagreement might be related to how feasible, or how sufficient each of these two pathways respectively are?
Absent any known pathways that solve all three, I’m glad people are exploring both of these pathways (and the potential overlap between them). I hope that there is increased exploration.
Perhaps we are going through a temporary phase of increased contention between Pauses versus RSPs as they both may be vying for similar memetic uptake (e.g. on the lesswrong home page right now there is a link for “Global Pause AI Protest” events spread across seven countries happening a few days from now.)
(Conflict of interest: I support implementation of Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy)
Was a widely impactful piece of work, beyond the bounds of the less wrong community