bokov

• bokovJun 3, 2024, 11:37 PM

  1 point

  0

  on: Another at­tempt to ex­plain UDT

  Are there any practical applications of UDT that don’t depend on uncertainty as to whether or not I am a simulation, nor on stipulating that one of the participants in a scenario is capable of predicting my decisions with perfect accuracy?

• bokovMay 24, 2024, 10:52 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: PhilosophicalSoul’s comment on: Re­quest for com­ments/​opinions/​ideas on safety/​ethics for use of tool AI in a large health­care sys­tem.

  I appreciate your feedback and take it in the spirit it is intended. You are in no danger of shitting on my idea because it’s not my idea. It’s happening with or without me.

  My idea is to cast a broad net looking for strategies for harm reduction and risk mitigation within these constraints.

  I’m with you that machines practising medicine autonomously is an bad idea, as do doctors. Because, idealistically, they got into this work in order to help people, and cynically, they don’t want to be rendered redundant.

  The primary focus looks like workflow management, not diagnoses. E.g. how to reduce the amount of time various requests sit in a queue by figuring out which humans are most likely the ones who should be reading them.

  Also, predictive modelling, e.g. which patients are at elevated risk for bad outcomes. Or how many nurses to schedule for a particular shift. Though these don’t necessarily need AI/​ML and long predate AI/​ML.

  Then there are auto-suggestor/​auto-reminder use-cases: “You coded this patient as having diabetes without complications, but the text notes suggest diabetes with nephropathy, are you sure you didn’t mean to use that more specific code?”

  So, at least in the short term, AI apps will not have the opportunity to screw up in the immediately obvious ways like incorrect diagnoses or incorrect orders. It’s the more subtle screw-ups that I’m worried about at the moment.

[Question] Re­quest for com­ments/​opinions/​ideas on safety/​ethics for use of tool AI in a large health­care sys­tem.

• bokovSep 20, 2023, 11:24 AM

  1 point

  on: Refram­ing Su­per­in­tel­li­gence: Com­pre­hen­sive AI Ser­vices as Gen­eral Intelligence

  Definition please.

  VNM

• bokovAug 3, 2023, 1:28 PM

  15 points

  9

  on: What works for ADHD and/​or re­lated things?

  The first step is to see a psychiatrist and take the medication they recommend. For me it was an immediate night-and-day difference. I don’t know why the hell I wasted so much of my life before I finally went and got treatment. Don’t repeat my mistake.

• bokovMay 15, 2023, 3:53 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: the gears to ascension’s comment on: Con­trary to List of Lethal­ity’s point 22, al­ign­ment’s door num­ber 2

  Yes, OP

• bokovApr 11, 2023, 7:04 PM

  1 point

  0

  on: Con­trary to List of Lethal­ity’s point 22, al­ign­ment’s door num­ber 2

  I actually tried running your essay through ChatGPT to make it more readable but it’s way too long. Can you at least break it into non-redundant sections not more than 3000 words each? Then we can do the rest.

• bokovApr 11, 2023, 6:57 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: the gears to ascension’s comment on: Con­trary to List of Lethal­ity’s point 22, al­ign­ment’s door num­ber 2

  I second that. I actually tried to read your other posts because I was curious to find out why you are getting downvoted—maybe I can learn something outside the LW party-line from you.

  But unfortunately, you don’t explain your position in clear, easy to understand terms so I’m going to have to put off sorting through your stuff until I have more time.

• bokovMar 5, 2023, 10:31 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: jimrandomh’s comment on: Is it time to talk about AI dooms­day prep­ping yet?

  I meant prepping metaphorically, in the see of being willing to delve into the specifics of a scenario most other people would dismiss as unwinnable. The reason I posted this is that though it’s obvious that the bunker approach isn’t really the right one, I’m drawing a blank for what the right approach would even look like.

  That being said, I figured into class of scenario might look identical to nuclear or biological war, only facilitated by AI. Are you saying scenarios where many but not all people die due to political/​economic/​environmental consequences of AI emergence are unlikely enough to disregard?

  So let’s talk about dystopias/​wierdtopias. Do you see any categories into which these can be grouped? The question then becomes, who will lose the most and who will lose the least under various types of scenarios.

Is it time to talk about AI dooms­day prep­ping yet?

• bokovNov 23, 2022, 7:20 PM

  1 point

  0

  on: Why not more au­to­mated grenade drop UAVs in Ukraine?

  It’s ironic that you’re so excited about autonomous weapons but the first video you posted is a dramatic depiction created by a YouTube account called “Stop Autonomous Weapons”.

  I think the idea of this video was to scare the public by how powerful, precise, and possibly opaque these weapons are.

  But I agree with you—ethical or not, groups that limit their use of these weapons will be at a disadvantage against groups that do not. That’s a microcosm of the whole AI regulatory problem right there.

• bokovNov 10, 2022, 9:30 AM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Ruby’s comment on: How much should we care about non-hu­man an­i­mals?

  I’m sad to see him go. I don’t know enough about LWs history and have too little experience with forum moderation to agree or disagree with your decision. Though LW had been around for a very long time without imploding so that’s evidence you guys know what you’re doing.

  Please don’t take down his post though. I believe somewhere in there is a good faith opinion at odds with my own. I want to read and understand it. Just not ready for this much reading tonight.

  I wish I could write so prolifically! Or maybe it’s a curse rather than a blessing because then it becomes an obstacle to people understanding your point of view.

• bokovNov 4, 2022, 9:47 PM

  3 points

  0

  on: Open Let­ter Against Reck­less Nu­clear Es­ca­la­tion and Use

  Are there any links we can read about non-appeasing de-escalation strategies?

  Either theoretical ones or ones that have been tried in the past are fine.

How much should we care about non-hu­man an­i­mals?

• bokovNov 3, 2022, 8:22 PM

  26 points

  19

  on: Open Let­ter Against Reck­less Nu­clear Es­ca­la­tion and Use

  There have been “Nuclear first-use and threats or advocacy thereof” and those are easy to condemn. But as far as I know they are coming unilaterally from the Russian side and already being widely condemned by those not on the Russian side. But it sounds like you are looking for some broader consensus to condemn escalation on both sides.

  Unfortunately neither this post nor the open letter you linked give any specifics about what other behaviours you are asking us to condemn. I’m reluctant to risk endorsing a false-equivalence argument by signing a blank check.

  Is blowing up the Kerch bridge escalatory? Is Arestovich trolling the occupiers to sap their morale and bolster the morale of the defenders escalatory? I’m not qualified to determine whether the tactical or psychological benefit is justified by the escalatory risk of these sorts of actions and in the Kerch example, we don’t even know if it was done by the Ukrainian government, provocateurs, or sympathizers acting independently.

  I agree that it’s not a binary choice between appeasement and escalation, and I am very curious about the non-appeasing de-escalation strategies you allude to. That’s what we should be brainstorming and what you should lead with in your letter for it to be convincing.

• bokovOct 28, 2022, 10:14 PM

  1 point

  1

  in reply to: ChristianKl’s comment on: The harms you don’t see

  The EU approach to getting Ukraine to protect the rights of minorities seems more… sustainable… than Russia’s approach, so I propose a different compromise:
  
  How about Russia withdraw all its troops back to the 2014 borders and we all give the slow, non-violent path a chance to work.

• bokovOct 28, 2022, 10:06 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: clone of saturn’s comment on: The harms you don’t see

  I’m not equating the West and Anti-West in terms of power. I agree that the Anti-West is much weaker. That doesn’t mean it’s incapable of becoming a threat in the future.

• bokovOct 28, 2022, 10:00 PM

  10 points

  7

  in reply to: Viliam’s comment on: Ukraine and the Crimea Question

  Furthermore, it’s up to the Ukrainian people to confront their dark past. Not Russians to do it for them.

  Just like it’s up to Americans to confront and atone for America’s history of slavery. Not some neighbouring country to roll in with tanks and turn our historical/​cultural/​political problem into a military one.

• bokovOct 28, 2022, 9:48 PM

  30 points

  31

  on: Ukraine and the Crimea Question

  This is basically a false equivalence “there are good/​bad people on both sides” type of argument.
  
  If some other country sent troops inside Russia’s borders and held a referendum for whether or not the regions they occupied want to be annexed, I would consider Russia to be the victim no matter how screwed up its internal politics are. Furthermore, such a referendum would not be legitimate no matter how honestly executed it is because the presence of foreign troops and displacement of civilians already hopelessly biases the outcome.

  For the same reason, until there are no more Russian soldiers inside of Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders, I see no reason to treat these referenda and complicated stories about some Ukrainians someplace being Nazis as anything other than Russian propaganda, albeit you deserve praise for well crafted propaganda delivered in a civil manner.

• bokovOct 18, 2022, 6:54 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: ChristianKl’s comment on: The harms you don’t see

  A decisively defeated Russia will have fewer resources with which to coerce him. And if he’s smart and keeps his powder dry like he has, he will have more resources with which to resist.

  And if he gets overthrown in a color revolution, the Belarussians have not yet gotten so much blood on their hands as to preclude support from the West.