Also, under the assumption that Eliezer reads these threads—usually, the critique is anchored on Harry, but moves on to poking at Draco’s little-professor-ness. Though I’m sure there are plenty of idiots who go on about Harry not being eleven, most of the intelligent detractors I’ve taught to quickly move on.
I’m sure that they’re anchored by Harry’s not-normal-ness, but at least they don’t keep pushing that once it’s pointed out that Harry is intended to be Voldemort.
I’m not as smart as fictional Harry, but I knew at a younger age that books about sex (e.g. sex-ed texts intended for an adolescent audience, when I was several years from it) were books that some adults would prefer I not get into.
Also, under the assumption that Eliezer reads these threads—usually, the critique is anchored on Harry, but moves on to poking at Draco’s little-professor-ness. Though I’m sure there are plenty of idiots who go on about Harry not being eleven, most of the intelligent detractors I’ve taught to quickly move on.
I’m sure that they’re anchored by Harry’s not-normal-ness, but at least they don’t keep pushing that once it’s pointed out that Harry is intended to be Voldemort.
Am I the only one who thinks it’s not realistic that an eleven-year-old in the 1990s hasn’t had any dirty thoughts?
Some 11 year olds aren’t interested in sex yet. Others are forks of an adult Tom Riddle who similarly isn’t interested in sex.
Harry’s a late bloomer, and he doesn’t have any sexual figures around him to induce fantasy.
He did read all of the books he’s not supposed to.
I’m not as smart as fictional Harry, but I knew at a younger age that books about sex (e.g. sex-ed texts intended for an adolescent audience, when I was several years from it) were books that some adults would prefer I not get into.