(fyi, it looks like the overall outcome here is pretty good, i.e. 46% of scholars getting a 9 or 10 seems significant. But, the framing of the overview-section at the beginning feels like it’s trying to oversell me on something)
Do you think “46% of scholar projects were rated 9⁄10 or higher” is better? What about “scholar projects were rated 8.1/10 on average” ?
I think the practice that’d probably make most to me is just reporting the average for each thing, without making much of a claim about what it meant.
(fyi, it looks like the overall outcome here is pretty good, i.e. 46% of scholars getting a 9 or 10 seems significant. But, the framing of the overview-section at the beginning feels like it’s trying to oversell me on something)
Do you think “46% of scholar projects were rated 9⁄10 or higher” is better? What about “scholar projects were rated 8.1/10 on average” ?
I think the practice that’d probably make most to me is just reporting the average for each thing, without making much of a claim about what it meant.