I’ve developed a habit for when I want to feel like I’m doing something productive, yet there’s no real work I feel up to at that moment: tidying up. It accomplishes something (albeit something admittedly minor and unessential) while not being cognitively taxing, and it’s always available immediately. Of course, it’s also a way to procrastinate on higher-value tasks, but given the way I tend to function, I know I could be doing worse.
I’m experimenting with a randomized system of task-setting. (My main goal is autodidacticism in a bunch of disciplines.) I divided the subjects I want to study into 3 lists of 6 disciplines each, 18 in total. Every day I roll a dice to decide which of them I am to study on that day. The first roll decides the list; I have assigned each list two numbers out of the six available ones, and if either of them comes up on the first roll, then it’s that list that I pick. The next roll decides which of the 6 disciplines in a given list I am to study. The third roll decides how many half-hours I should spend on it. (I initially tried that with full hours, but if I’m unlucky enough to get two sixes in a row, then that day’s schedule is filled to the brim.) To give an example, the rolls 6 − 1 − 3 mean: from the Humanities list (which has the numbers 1 and 6 assigned to it) choose History (discipline number 1 on that list) and study it for 1 hour and a half (3 x 30 min = 90 min). I do this a few times, up until my schedule for that day is filled, to end up with a bastardized version of a schoolkid’s timetable, but without the predictability. The problem? I don’t always find myself willing to obey the dice. Sometimes I’m not happy with the resulting schedule and just decide to ignore it and go study something else instead. But a big part of the reason why I implemented this system in the first place is not to focus on certain disciplines to the detriment of the others. On the other hand, I could use a boost to the enjoyment I get from doing the tasks, and restrictions on what I should study take away from that. Dunno. Will figure out a solution to this.
I’m beginning to realize that my biggest productivity-related failure is by far my habit of going weeks without even thinking once about my goals. Usually it takes something like a LW post on akrasia (since I check LW daily, even and especially when I’m having a “lazy day”) to get me back on track. I’m not sure it would work if I tried to send myself mere memos, like programming my alarm clock app to ring at a given time the next day, to remind me of the need to do some studying that day. I’d just feel annoyed and shut it down at once. For something to work, it needs to appeal to my interest in productivity/motivation hacks and then make me go through a certain thought process: visualizing how cool it would be to be able to work hard, and then autonomously concluding that it’s high time I did something for my goals. I’m not sure I could do that on a cue, but if there is such a cue that would work, I need to know about it.
I’ve developed a habit for when I want to feel like I’m doing something productive, yet there’s no real work I feel up to at that moment: tidying up. It accomplishes something (albeit something admittedly minor and unessential) while not being cognitively taxing, and it’s always available immediately. Of course, it’s also a way to procrastinate on higher-value tasks, but given the way I tend to function, I know I could be doing worse.
I’m experimenting with a randomized system of task-setting. (My main goal is autodidacticism in a bunch of disciplines.) I divided the subjects I want to study into 3 lists of 6 disciplines each, 18 in total. Every day I roll a dice to decide which of them I am to study on that day. The first roll decides the list; I have assigned each list two numbers out of the six available ones, and if either of them comes up on the first roll, then it’s that list that I pick. The next roll decides which of the 6 disciplines in a given list I am to study. The third roll decides how many half-hours I should spend on it. (I initially tried that with full hours, but if I’m unlucky enough to get two sixes in a row, then that day’s schedule is filled to the brim.) To give an example, the rolls 6 − 1 − 3 mean: from the Humanities list (which has the numbers 1 and 6 assigned to it) choose History (discipline number 1 on that list) and study it for 1 hour and a half (3 x 30 min = 90 min). I do this a few times, up until my schedule for that day is filled, to end up with a bastardized version of a schoolkid’s timetable, but without the predictability. The problem? I don’t always find myself willing to obey the dice. Sometimes I’m not happy with the resulting schedule and just decide to ignore it and go study something else instead. But a big part of the reason why I implemented this system in the first place is not to focus on certain disciplines to the detriment of the others. On the other hand, I could use a boost to the enjoyment I get from doing the tasks, and restrictions on what I should study take away from that. Dunno. Will figure out a solution to this.
I’m beginning to realize that my biggest productivity-related failure is by far my habit of going weeks without even thinking once about my goals. Usually it takes something like a LW post on akrasia (since I check LW daily, even and especially when I’m having a “lazy day”) to get me back on track. I’m not sure it would work if I tried to send myself mere memos, like programming my alarm clock app to ring at a given time the next day, to remind me of the need to do some studying that day. I’d just feel annoyed and shut it down at once. For something to work, it needs to appeal to my interest in productivity/motivation hacks and then make me go through a certain thought process: visualizing how cool it would be to be able to work hard, and then autonomously concluding that it’s high time I did something for my goals. I’m not sure I could do that on a cue, but if there is such a cue that would work, I need to know about it.