What would be more persuasive is some evidence that AI is relatively more useful for making bioweapons than it is for doing things in general.
I see little reason to use that comparison rather than “will [category of AI models under consideration] improve offense (in bioterrorism, say) relative to defense?”
I see little reason to use that comparison rather than “will [category of AI models under consideration] improve offense (in bioterrorism, say) relative to defense?”