But being vulnerable to Pascal’s Mugging is such a serious flaw, I’m tempted to say that it’s just a necessary requirement for mental stability, so any utility function and predictor which don’t guarantee this when they’re combined should be considered incompatible.
Is the wording of this correct? Did you mean to say that vulnerability to Pascal’s mugging is a necessary requirement for mental stability or the opposite?
Is the wording of this correct? Did you mean to say that vulnerability to Pascal’s mugging is a necessary requirement for mental stability or the opposite?
No, I meant to say that immunity to Pascal’s mugging is required.