Thanks. I think I gained useful insights from this but found the wording a bit confusing. I assume you mean something like “The stag/rabbit frame assumes that it’s a coordination, when sometimes [often?] it’s a values disagreement. In real life people have different goals, so don’t necessarily get the same utility from a given action. And in the literal rabbit/stag/hunters example, the various options don’t actually produce the same utility since people get diminishing returns from meat.”
...
“The Schelling Point is Rabbit” is (hopefully obviously) a bit of a simplification, and I agree that you’ll want to actually look at everyone’s goals in a given situation.
Thanks. I think I gained useful insights from this but found the wording a bit confusing. I assume you mean something like “The stag/rabbit frame assumes that it’s a coordination, when sometimes [often?] it’s a values disagreement. In real life people have different goals, so don’t necessarily get the same utility from a given action. And in the literal rabbit/stag/hunters example, the various options don’t actually produce the same utility since people get diminishing returns from meat.”
...
“The Schelling Point is Rabbit” is (hopefully obviously) a bit of a simplification, and I agree that you’ll want to actually look at everyone’s goals in a given situation.