It does not seem economically possible to build a city that is cheap to live in without locking the price of land down in some way, at some point. It is not obvious how to do this well, but eminent domain seems to be a necessary component of it.
No it does not. Though I’ll concede “it does not seem possible” is closer to meaning that, I kind of misspoke, my stance is more; I have reasons to think it’s probably impossible (see comment).
Though I wouldn’t ask if I weren’t open to being surprised.
From their website:
Building the Future of Governance
for the Cities of Tomorrow
They’re interested in better solutions. “Impossible” just means “it’s never been done”.
No it does not. Though I’ll concede “it does not seem possible” is closer to meaning that, I kind of misspoke, my stance is more; I have reasons to think it’s probably impossible (see comment).
Though I wouldn’t ask if I weren’t open to being surprised.