The CI.states that observers make observations that are classical in a certain sense, such as being real-valued. It doesn’t say that they cause anything, or that the WF is real..and therefore doesn’t need to say that the WF needs to be collapsed.
I agree, the special role of the observer in CI does not necessarily extend to any ’must cause something’, ‘need to be collapsed’, ‘xyz must be real’, etc., theories. Many theories argue the existence of the observer must imply x or y or z, or some combination thereof, but that’s not what this essay is concerned with nor do I endorse any specific theory.
The CI.states that observers make observations that are classical in a certain sense, such as being real-valued. It doesn’t say that they cause anything, or that the WF is real..and therefore doesn’t need to say that the WF needs to be collapsed.
I agree, the special role of the observer in CI does not necessarily extend to any ’must cause something’, ‘need to be collapsed’, ‘xyz must be real’, etc., theories. Many theories argue the existence of the observer must imply x or y or z, or some combination thereof, but that’s not what this essay is concerned with nor do I endorse any specific theory.