Hmm, a mathematical framework then. (I doubt something like this would have a good solution that could be concisely expressed in words alone.)
Is it a voting system with some kind of safeguards against double-counting? As in, a single entity voting an infinite number of times for a particular option doesn’t shift the outcome toward that option?
But no… you’d only come up with that if you were trying to optimise for anonymity.
I’m reasonably sure it’s a mathematical framework, though.
He says ‘answers like “iterated runoff voting,” … are not in themselves what I’m looking for’, so I think a voting system is not what he’s thinking about.
Hmm, a mathematical framework then. (I doubt something like this would have a good solution that could be concisely expressed in words alone.)
Is it a voting system with some kind of safeguards against double-counting? As in, a single entity voting an infinite number of times for a particular option doesn’t shift the outcome toward that option?
But no… you’d only come up with that if you were trying to optimise for anonymity.
I’m reasonably sure it’s a mathematical framework, though.
He says ‘answers like “iterated runoff voting,” … are not in themselves what I’m looking for’, so I think a voting system is not what he’s thinking about.