I totally forgot about this post, and in the context of the 2019 Review I am interested in how Abram now thinks about it.
At the time I think I generally liked the line of questioning this post was asking, and felt like it was the right way to go about following up on the questions posed in the “It’s Not the Incentives, It’s You” discussion.
I guess I have the impression that it’s difficult to talk about the issues in this post, especially publicly, without being horribly misunderstood (by some). Which is some evidence about the object level questions.
I regret writing this post because I later heard that Michael Arc was using the fact that I wrote it as evidence of corruption inside MIRI, which sorta overshadows my thinking about the post.
I totally forgot about this post, and in the context of the 2019 Review I am interested in how Abram now thinks about it.
At the time I think I generally liked the line of questioning this post was asking, and felt like it was the right way to go about following up on the questions posed in the “It’s Not the Incentives, It’s You” discussion.
I guess I have the impression that it’s difficult to talk about the issues in this post, especially publicly, without being horribly misunderstood (by some). Which is some evidence about the object level questions.
I regret writing this post because I later heard that Michael Arc was using the fact that I wrote it as evidence of corruption inside MIRI, which sorta overshadows my thinking about the post.