He seems to be going into details about those other points in part 2, which he already posted.
Interestingly, I think he should go into less details about those scenarios, to avoid boring his audience and losing them in irrelevant detail. Which goes to show there’s no pleasing everybody.
He seems to be going into details about those other points in part 2, which he already posted.
Interestingly, I think he should go into less details about those scenarios, to avoid boring his audience and losing them in irrelevant detail. Which goes to show there’s no pleasing everybody.
Yeah, like most books for academics, this is definitely a book only for people who are highly interested in this very narrow topic.