I’m curious how it’ll work. I felt like meta content was pretty hidden before. If there’s a desire to make meta stuff hidden by default, maybe it could be a hidden-by-default tag, but controlled via the same tag filtering as everything else, so that it’s pretty obvious that it’s hidden and how to un-hide it. Or maybe hiding it is bad.
My personal sense is that usually meta stuff should be neither hidden nor promoted, excluding announcements that should get extra exposure temporarily. I definitely want people to feel an affordance to discuss site meta, and also see thinking behind and past records.
I wasn’t around when past decisions about meta were made, nor am I completely sure what others on the team think. We are, of course, open to feedback from others.
Is the “site meta” tag taking the place of https://www.lesswrong.com/meta?
I believe yes, though we haven’t gotten around to fully deprecating/redirecting, etc.
I’m curious how it’ll work. I felt like meta content was pretty hidden before. If there’s a desire to make meta stuff hidden by default, maybe it could be a hidden-by-default tag, but controlled via the same tag filtering as everything else, so that it’s pretty obvious that it’s hidden and how to un-hide it. Or maybe hiding it is bad.
My personal sense is that usually meta stuff should be neither hidden nor promoted, excluding announcements that should get extra exposure temporarily. I definitely want people to feel an affordance to discuss site meta, and also see thinking behind and past records.
I wasn’t around when past decisions about meta were made, nor am I completely sure what others on the team think. We are, of course, open to feedback from others.