I think it would be more accurate to say that anyone who after reading the sequences still disagrees, but is unable to explain where they believe the sequences have gone wrong, is not worth arguing with.
With this qualification, it no longer seems like evidence of being cult.
I’ve not seen this happening—examples?
I think it would be more accurate to say that anyone who after reading the sequences still disagrees, but is unable to explain where they believe the sequences have gone wrong, is not worth arguing with.
With this qualification, it no longer seems like evidence of being cult.