Hey thanks for your review! Though I’m not sure that either this article or Cunningham et al. can reasonably be described as a reproduction of Anthropic’s results (by which I assume you’re talking about Bricken et al.), given their relative timings and contents.
Hey thanks for your review! Though I’m not sure that either this article or Cunningham et al. can reasonably be described as a reproduction of Anthropic’s results (by which I assume you’re talking about Bricken et al.), given their relative timings and contents.
Oops, yes, I had the chronology of the papers I was thinking of confused — my apologies, I stand corrected. So I’m now more impressed with this paper.
Let me reedit my review comment above for clarity — so your comment will then seem like a non-sequitur.