Maybe it’s metaphysically possible that there’s some explanation that needs no explanation, but how would we know if a particular explanation qualifies?
Axioms give the starting assumptions for generating consequences within logical systems. If our reality is defined in terms of such a system (which is entirely possible), the rules generating it could be expected to point back toward a small set of irreducible axioms, but that doesn’t mean no “why” questions would be left; it means that definitive answers to them would be unavailable within the context of the system.
Maybe it’s metaphysically possible that there’s some explanation that needs no explanation, but how would we know if a particular explanation qualifies?
It would produce no ‘why’ questions, there would be nothing else to explain, ignore, or worship.
Axioms give the starting assumptions for generating consequences within logical systems. If our reality is defined in terms of such a system (which is entirely possible), the rules generating it could be expected to point back toward a small set of irreducible axioms, but that doesn’t mean no “why” questions would be left; it means that definitive answers to them would be unavailable within the context of the system.