But that’s the point of the argument! It’s showing how one of the implications of physicalism is false—zombies are possible.
But where did you prove that zombies are possible? The only evidence you provide is that you can imagine them existing in a non-physicalist world-view.
You might not think that zombies are possible. But then that would be the problem with the argument. It’s not that the argument is circular. It’s that one of the premises is false (or unjustified).
But where did you prove that zombies are possible? The only evidence you provide is that you can imagine them existing in a non-physicalist world-view.
You might not think that zombies are possible. But then that would be the problem with the argument. It’s not that the argument is circular. It’s that one of the premises is false (or unjustified).